Seizure control and treatment in pregnancy: Observations from the EURAP Epilepsy in Pregnancy Registry

The Eurap Study Group; Neurology 2006; 66 (3); 354-360

Commented by Professor Emilio Perucca, 22 Mar 2006

Background

Endocrine/metabolic changes during pregnancy may affect seizure susceptibility as well as the pharmacokinetics of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) (ref. 1; ref. 2).

Aim

To investigate changes in seizure control and AED treatment during pregnancy in women with epilepsy (WWE).

Methods

  • Non-interventional prospective observation of 1,956 pregnancies in 1,882 WWE enrolled in a multinational pregnancy registry (ref. 3) within gestation week 16. All women were on AEDs at enrolment.
  • Seizures were classified as generalized tonic-clonic (convulsive) or other seizure types (non-convulsive) and categorized in each trimester by frequency (no seizures, <1/month, monthly, weekly, more than weekly, daily). AED changes were recorded.

Results

  • 58.3% of women were seizure-free during the entire observation period. Using the first trimester as reference, seizure frequency remained unchanged throughout pregnancy in 63.6%, increased in 17.3% and decreased in 15.9%. Seizures during deliver occurred in 3.3%.
  • Seizure occurred more commonly in patients with partial epilepsy and on polytherapy.
  • 36 cases of status epilepticus (12 convulsive) resulted in one case of stillbirth but no other cases of miscarriage or adverse maternal outcome.
  • Number or doses of AEDs increased more often in women with seizures and in those on monotherapy with lamotrigine or oxcarbazepine. Women on oxcarbazepine monotherapy were also more likely to have convulsive seizures and to show seizure deterioration.

Professor Perucca's comments

Prior to this work, the largest prospective studies on seizure control in pregnancy enrolled less than 160 patients (ref. 4; ref. 5; ref. 6; ref. 7; ref. 8). The strengths of this study are its uniquely large sample size, its prospective design and a population drawn from a wide range of settings (>300 reporting physicians from 30 countries in 4 continents). The fact that 60% of WWE were seizure-free throughout and 80% were on monotherapy suggests that, compared with most previous studies, the population was less biased towards severe epilepsy cases.

The study, however, is not free from drawbacks:

  1. it was not population-based
  2. there was no control group of non-pregnant WWE
  3. seizure frequency was recorded by categories rather than quantitated precisely
  4. changes in seizure control were assessed versus the first trimester, not versus a pre-pregnancy baseline. Drawbacks derive in part from the fact the registry is primarily designed to investigate birth defects (ref. 3), rather than seizure frequency.

In agreement with previous reports (ref. 2; ref. 4; ref. 5; ref. 9; ref. 10; ref. 11), the data indicate that most WWE do not show major changes in seizure control during pregnancy. This is a reassuring message for WWE planning pregnancy.

Perhaps the most interesting finding is that only one of 36 cases of status epilepticus was associated with stillbirth, and none with maternal mortality. This contrasts with the commonly held view, based on retrospective and probably biased case reports (ref. 12), that status epilepticus during pregnancy results in high fetal and maternal mortality.

Another interesting finding was that increases in AED number or doses after the first trimester occurred more often in patients on oxcarbazepine or lamotrigine monotherapy. Women on oxcarbazepine were also more likely to show seizure deterioration during pregnancy. Although interpretation should be cautious due to non-randomized treatment allocation, these findings could be related to pharmacokinetic changes.   

Although the blood levels of most AEDs decrease during pregnancy (ref. 13; ref. 14), pharmacokinetic changes are known to be especially prominent for lamotrigine (ref. 15; ref. 16; ref. 17; ref. 18). Similarly to lamotrigine, the active mono-hydroxy-derivative (MHD) of oxcarbazepine is cleared by glucuronide conjugation (ref. 19), and preliminary data suggest that MHD concentrations may also fall markedly during pregnancy (ref. 20). Follow-up studies correlating seizure frequency changes with alterations in AED levels during pregnancy are clearly required.

References

1. Pennell PB. Pregnancy in women who have epilepsy. Neurologic Clinics 2004; 22 (4); 799-820

2. Schmidt D. The effect of pregnancy on the natural history of epilepsy: a review of the literature. In: Janz D, Dam M, Bossi L, Helge H, Richens A, Schmidt D, eds. Epilepsy, pregnancy, and the child. New York: Raven Press, 1982; 3–14 

3. Tomson T, Battino D, Bonizzoni E, Craig J, Lindhout D, Perucca E, et al.; Collaborative EURAP Study Group. EURAP: an international registry of antiepileptic drugs and pregnancy. Epilepsia 2004; 45 (11); 1463-1464

4. Bardy AH. Incidence of seizures during pregnancy, labor and puerperium in epileptic women: a prospective study. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 1987; 75 (5); 356–360

5. Schmidt D, Canger R, Avanzini G, et al. Change of seizure frequency in pregnant epileptic women. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1983; 46 (8); 751–755

6. Otani K. Risk factors for the increased seizure frequency during pregnancy and puerperium. Folia Psychiatrica et Neurologica Japonican 1985; 39 (1); 33–41

7. Lander CM and Eadie MJ. Plasma antiepileptic drug concentrations during pregnancy. Epilepsia 1991; 32 (2); 257–266

8. Tanganelli P and Regesta G. Epilepsy, pregnancy, and major birth anomalies: an Italian prospective, controlled study. Neurology 1992; 42 (4 suppl 5); 89–93

9. Gjerde IO, Strandjord RE and Ulstein M. The course of epilepsy during pregnancy: a study of 78 cases. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 1988; 78 (3); 198–205

10. Tomson T, Lindbom U, Ekqvist B and Sundqvist A. Epilepsy and pregnancy: a prospective study of seizure control in relation to free and total plasma concentrations of carbamazepine and phenytoin. Epilepsia 1994; 35 (1); 122–130

11. Sabers A, Rogvi-Hansen B, Dam M, et al. Pregnancy and epilepsy: a retrospective study of 151 pregnancies. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 1998; 97 (3); 164–170

12. Teramo K, Hiilesmaa VK. Pregnancy and fetal complications in epileptic pregnancies. In: Janz D, Dam M, Bossi L, Helge H, Richens A, Schmidt D, eds. Epilepsy, pregnancy, and the child. New York: Raven Press, 1982; 53–59

13. Yerby MS, Friel PN and McCormick K. Antiepileptic drug disposition during pregnancy. Neurology 1992; 42 (4 Suppl 5); 12-16

14. Pennell PB. Antiepileptic drug pharmacokinetics during pregnancy and lactation. Neurology 2003; 61 (6 Suppl 2); S35-42

15. Ohman I, Vitols S and Tomson T. Lamotrigine in pregnancy: pharmacokinetics during delivery, in the neonate, and during lactation. Epilepsia 2000; 41 (6); 709-713

16. Tran TA, Leppik IE, Blesi K, et al. Lamotrigine clearance during pregnancy. Neurology 2002; 59 (2); 251-255

17. Pennell PB, Newport DJ, Stowe ZN, et al. The impact of pregnancy and childbirth on the metabolism of lamotrigine. Neurology 2004; 62 (2); 292-295

18. De Haan GJ, Edelbroek P, Segers J, et al. Gestation-induced changes in lamotrigine pharmacokinetics: A monotherapy study. Neurology 2004; 63 (3); 571-573

19. May TW, Korn-Merker E and Rambeck B. Clinical pharmacokinetics of oxcarbazepine. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 2003; 42 (12); 1023-1042 

20. Mazzucchelli I, Onat FY, Ozkara C, et al. Changes in the disposition of oxcarbazepine and its metabolites during pregnancy and puerperium. Epilepsia 2006; 47 (3); 504-509

Last updated: 22.03.2006
Related Articles

24 Nov 2006

26 Oct 2006

27 Sep 2006

25 Jul 2006

23 Jun 2006

23 May 2006

28 Apr 2006

20 Feb 2006

17 Jan 2006

22 Nov 2005

23 Oct 2005

21 Sep 2005

22 Aug 2005

26 Jul 2005

16 Jun 2005

22 May 2005

21 Apr 2005

22 Mar 2005

18 Feb 2005

24 Jan 2005

22 Nov 2004

22 Oct 2004

22 Sep 2004

23 Aug 2004

28 Jul 2004

16 Jun 2004

24 May 2004

19 Apr 2004

24 Mar 2004

23 Feb 2004

28 Jan 2004

4 Dec 2003

21 Nov 2003

27 Oct 2003

25 Sep 2003

22 Aug 2003

29 Jul 2003

24 Jun 2003